Victor T.
2010-08-26 21:03:19 UTC
Besides, it wouldn't be of use anyway since debug information is somewhat
tied to
the internals of the compiler and it's likely that the Microsoft
debugger would not be able to make sense of gcc's debug data even if gcc
could write it in PDB format -- at least for C++ where the mangling and
ABIs are totally different.
Can someone elaborate on this last point? I'm looking to write a tool fortied to
the internals of the compiler and it's likely that the Microsoft
debugger would not be able to make sense of gcc's debug data even if gcc
could write it in PDB format -- at least for C++ where the mangling and
ABIs are totally different.
debug format conversion for interoperability but what Brian mentioned here
has me concerned.
When debugging any compiled binary regardless of the compiler used, can't
they all be debugged at the assembly level? So can't a PDB debug format in
theory map the source line to the corresponding assembly address of a binary
built with say MinGW? What possible roadblocks are there that prevents this
idea from working fully?
Thanks
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Generate-PDB-files-tp18268068p29546940.html
Sent from the MinGW - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Generate-PDB-files-tp18268068p29546940.html
Sent from the MinGW - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.